Given its rapid adoption, it is relevant to summarize the research findings from the scientific community and determine where NeuroTracker stands relative to the original goals.
NEUROTRACKER ADHD PROFESSIONAL
Figure 1 is a world map showing the spread of the distribution of the NeuroTracker system used in professional and university settings as of June 2016. The result of this introduction has been a rapid adoption of the technique by independent users, professionals and researchers (around 400,000 total). Also to inherently force the brain to simultaneously solicit different cognitive mechanisms such as dynamic attention, sustained attention, working memory and executive functions during the task. Our approach has been to propose an easy to understand exercise, along with features that would enhance transfer potential that avoids some of the limitations above. We have proposed a method called 3D-MOT in the scientific literature that is now commercially available under the name of NeuroTracker 1,2.
Other potential bottlenecks for the scalability of this intervention technique are the lack of simplicity and whether it can generalise to a variety of populations. This approach typically leads to very long training protocols, often between 30-40 hours, and leaves the users and professionals wondering whether this is the most efficient form of brain training. However, although there is growing evidence that enhancing cognitive functions with generic approaches does demonstrate near and far transfer capacities, the established commercial solutions have been criticised because studies tend to only provide evidence of transfer to abilities structurally similar to the training task.Īnother potential criticism is that many solutions use a shotgun approach with a large number of exercises that seemingly address specific aspects of brain function, with the underlying assumption that the brain will be able to use them dynamically and simultaneously, as is often required in real life situations. One assumption underlying this approach is that some perceptual-cognitive systems are fundamental for human performance and that training on these approaches will transfer to other tasks that were not trained but require similar cognitive systems (near transfer) and to real life abilities (far transfer). In the last decade we have seen a dramatic increase of commercially available computerised brain training methods for enhancing perceptual and cognitive capacities of individuals. NSERC-Essilor Industrial Research Chair, CanadaĬogniSens Applied Research Center, Canada These results suggest that the Neurotracker training program is accessible and effective for children and adolescents with a neurodevelopmental condition that is independent of diagnostic profile.Université de Montréal, Scool of Optometry, Canada Our findings demonstrate that training with NeuroTracker can benefit all students with problematic levels of attention, regardless of primary diagnosis. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between change in CPT-3 scores after training with NeuroTracker between the ASD and non-ASD groups. Training by diagnostic group revealed that NeuroTracker performance doubled from the first to the final training session for both the ASD and non-ASD groups. After 15 training sessions, participants were reassessed on the CPT-3. A pre-assessment measure of attention was obtained for all participants via the Conners Continuous Performance Task (CPT-3) and then all participants were equally and randomly into the experimental NeuroTracker training group (n = 43, n ASD = 16), active control group (n = 43, n ASD = 9) playing a strategy-math game: 2048, or treatment as usual group (n = 43, n ASD = 25). All participants had a primary diagnosis of either ASD (n = 43), or any other neurodevelopmental disorder (n = 86 i.e., ADHD, Intellectual Disorder). One hundred and twenty-nine students were included in the study ( M age = 13.24). We explored the effect of training attention with NeuroTracker for students diagnosed with ASD compared to those diagnosed with other neurodevelopmental disorders.
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and Intellectual Disability exhibiting different profiles of attention therefore, an examination of which clinical profile benefits most from visuo-attentive NeuroTracker training can provide additional information to tailor cognitive remediation programs from a needs-based perspective. A previous school-based study found that training with a Multiple Object-Tracking paradigm ( NeuroTracker) improved performance on a clinically validated measure of attention, for students diagnosed with a neurodevelopmental disorder (Tullo, Guy, Faubert, & Bertone, 2016).
0 kommentar(er)
